Skip To Navigation Skip To Content Skip To Footer
    Explore Ingrezza for your residents
    Insight Article
    Home > Articles > Article
    Chris Harrop
    Chris Harrop

    Ask most medical group leaders how they size up revenue cycle health and you’ll hear familiar terms: days in A/R, clean claim pass rate, A/R aging, denial rate. Useful trend lines, yes — yet they rarely tell you where work is accumulating or why cash is slow.

    In a 2025 MGMA Summit session, MedEvolve CEO Matt Seefeld and John Peloquin, President and CEO of Discovery Behavioral Health (DBH), argued for a next generation of performance metrics that illuminate real-time human effort and the true cost of inefficiency.

    “These new benchmarks that we’ve been able to establish … they really do move the needle,” Peloquin said. “Most organizations are still very subjective in how they look at individuals and their performance.”

    Limits of legacy metrics

    Traditional measures summarize outcomes after the fact. They rarely expose the workload hidden in getting to those outcomes.

    “If I were to go to John and say, ‘Hey, your A/R days are good,’ and leave it at that … none of that tells John, ‘But how many people and touches actually did it take to get my AR to where it is?’” Seefeld noted.

    From counts to touches: the operating lens that changes behavior

    Seefeld’s frame centers on “touch data” — a record of every human interaction from submission to payment. The north-star measure: the zero-touch rate, or the share of claims paid with no human intervention.

    “You collect a payment. Either A, it required nobody, which is what we want. … Or B, it actually required a touch, hopefully only one touch,” Seefeld said. “If it’s more than one touch, we have a real problem.”

    Across the industry, about 40% of claims are zero-touch. That leaves a wide field of preventable work. Each unnecessary touch carries a direct labor cost (often $2.50–$8 per touch) and a delay cost as claims wait in queues.

    “Every touch costs you money. That reduction down below in cost to collect is a real number,” Seefeld said. “Not only will you improve your labor cost … but you’re also going to improve net revenue.”

    Sign in to access this material

    Sign In Become a Member
    Chris Harrop

    Written By

    Chris Harrop

    Chris Harrop serves as Senior Editor on MGMA's Training and Development team, overseeing the Strategy, Growth and Governance vertical. Previous to this, he spent eight years as MGMA's Senior Editorial Manager, leading MGMA's publications team. In that role, he was editor of the quarterly MGMA Connection magazine, weekly MGMA Insights newsletter, and MGMA Stat, a weekly, nationwide polling initiative focus on real-time responses to industry topics. Since 2020, he also has been lead editor on MGMA's data summary reports, giving context to the benchmarks and trends in the MGMA DataDive survey datasets. He also regularly directs and serves as lead author or editor on a variety of industry whitepapers and research reports commissioned by MGMA's solution partners. Prior to MGMA, Chris was a journalist and community newsroom leader in multiple Denver-area news organizations.


    Explore Related Content

    More Insight Articles

    An error has occurred. The page may no longer respond until reloaded. An unhandled exception has occurred. See browser dev tools for details. Reload 🗙