Skip To Navigation Skip To Content Skip To Footer
    Insight Article
    Home > Articles > Article
    Chris Harrop
    Chris Harrop

    The early results from a new, AI-enabled revenue cycle tool look great: Clinicians spend less “pajama time” on documentation, charts close faster, IT reports clean EHR integration, and Finance sees fewer denials with stronger net collections.

    Then a payer flags unusual utilization patterns. A routine request becomes an audit. Leadership suddenly needs to answer two questions: Who approved this tool, and who owns it now?

    That scenario is exactly why AI governance has become a priority for practice leaders. In her 2026 MGMA Financial Conference session with co-presenters Hemant Gupta, JD, IAAP, and Kathleen M. Premo, Esq., of Epstein, Becker & Green, EBG Advisors’ Michelle J. Wright, framed the issue not as a question of whether to use AI — “it's how to govern it in a way that supports and protects patients.”

    While the industry moves quickly to add new tools, the goal of governance isn’t to slow adoption but rather ensure AI tool use is defensible as regulations evolve, vendors update models, and payer scrutiny increases.

    Sign in to access this material

    Sign In Become a Member
    Chris Harrop

    Written By

    Chris Harrop

    Chris Harrop is a Senior Editor on MGMA's Training and Development team, helping turn data complexity, the steady flow of news headlines and frontline feedback into practical tools and advice for medical group leaders. He previously led MGMA's publications as Senior Editorial Manager, managing MGMA Connection magazine, the MGMA Insights newsletter, and MGMA Stat, and MGMA summary data reports. Before joining MGMA, he was a journalist and newsroom leader in many Denver-area news organizations.


    Explore Related Content

    More Insight Articles

    An error has occurred. The page may no longer respond until reloaded. An unhandled exception has occurred. See browser dev tools for details. Reload 🗙