Be confident that your decisions are based on the most reliable academic data available.
Because your compensation structures are unique, you need data specific to your academic environment – data that is trusted by administration and physicians alike.
Benchmark your academic practice against the strongest clinical science department data available – data from clinical science departments, including faculty physicians and managers. Use this resource to make confident decisions that positively boost your practice's performance.
New this year
- Summary tables to evaluate specialties across multiple metrics
- Ability to create customizable dashboards that show the data that’s most important to you
- View data with one click and drill down to more specific data
- Improved navigation to help you see the data you need faster and easier
- Export data to Microsoft Excel® or download each table or graph into a single PDF file
With this secure and convenient tool, you can
- View your prepopulated data by department if you participated in the MGMA 2011 Academic Practice Compensation and Production Survey
- Apply a sophisticated, customizable compensation and production tracking tool for ongoing analysis
- Create custom reports, including ranking reports, to compare your practice's data to that of your peers’
- Develop compensation and production targets for your providers, including RVU productivity goals
- Show the relationship of compensation to production as it applies to your specialty, rank, geographic region and billable clinical activity
- Compare your compensation to key aggregate metrics for the private sector
- Export tables to spreadsheet format for further analysis
- View up to 10 specialties at once
This report contains
- More data than the printed report, including percentiles from 10 to 90 for more accurate ranking
- Key clinical department performance indicators
- Data categorized by key characteristics such as specialty, faculty rank and geographic region
- Management compensation by department and individual characteristics, such as education level and total medical revenue
- Five years of MGMA academic data and the percentage change for trending
- Your practice’s pre-populated data if your practice participated in MGMA’s 2011 Academic Practice Compensation and Production Survey
Please log in to submit a review.
'I use the MGMA academic survey report every year to benchmark compensation and productivity with other academic institutions and private practice. Having access to the results via the DataDive module makes it very easy to pull specific numbers together into one report, and to share as needed with my faculty.'
—
Stephanie Farmer, Director of Finance and Administration, University of Colorado School of Medicine